Follow us on:
Lorem Ipsum is simply dummy text of the printing and typesetting industry. Lorem Ipsum has been the industry's standard dummy text ever since the 1500s, when an unknown printer took a galley of type and scrambled it to make a type specimen book. It has survived not only five centuries, but also the leap into electronic typesetting, remaining essentially unchanged. It was popularised in the 1960s with the release of Letraset sheets containing Lorem Ipsum passages, and more recently with desktop publishing software like Aldus PageMaker including versions of Lorem Ipsum.
In a major digital governance initiative, the Department of Urban Development & Municipal Affairs, Government of West Bengal, has launched E-Mutation services via its online portal https://wburbanservices.org. This facility enables property owners within Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation (BMC) to apply for mutation of property records from the comfort of their home—without visiting municipal offices.This article explores the mutation process, the benefits of the E-Mutation portal, and how KHA Advocates, a premier legal service provider for property matters in West Bengal, can assist you throughout the procedure.🔍 What Is Property Mutation?Mutation refers to the process of changing the title ownership of a property in government records after it is transferred via sale, gift, inheritance, or will. It is essential for updating tax liabilities and establishing legal ownership in civic records maintained by the municipal body.🌐 About the WB Urban Services E-Mutation PortalThe wburbanservices.org portal is a centralized platform that enables digital mutation applications for urban areas. The Bidhannagar region is among the first to benefit from this online initiative.✅ Key Features:Online application submissionUpload of property documents in PDF formatStatus tracking of applicationSMS/Email alertsOnline approval and certificate download🏙️ Who Can Apply Through This Portal?Anyone who owns property within the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation (BMC) limits—covering areas like Salt Lake, Rajarhat, and parts of New Town—can apply for:Mutation due to sale deedMutation due to inheritance/successionMutation after partition or giftMutation upon registration of leasehold to freehold conversion📝 Documents Required for E-MutationRegistered Sale/Gift/Partition/Will DeedCopy of current tax billPrevious mutation certificate, if anyAadhar Card or Voter ID of the ownerAffidavit (if applicable)Succession certificate (for inheritance cases)🔄 Step-by-Step Process for E-Mutation on the PortalVisit https://wburbanservices.orgRegister/Login using your mobile number or emailSelect Municipality: Choose Bidhannagar Municipal CorporationFill Application Form: Enter property details, deed reference, applicant infoUpload Documents: Attach scanned copies (PDF only)Pay Online Fee (if applicable)Submit ApplicationTrack Status and download certificate once approved⚖️ How KHA Advocates Can Help YouAt KHA Advocates, we understand that even digital processes can be complex for first-time users or NRIs. Our expert team offers end-to-end assistance in:Title verification before mutationDrafting and notarizing mutation affidavitsEnsuring correct document format for uploadFiling applications on your behalfLegal support for disputed ownership or rejectionAssistance in mutation for inherited and leasehold propertiesWe provide mutation services for both NRIs and local clients, ensuring compliance, accuracy, and timely execution.📌 Why Choose KHA Advocates for E-Mutation?Dedicated Mutation ExpertsExperienced with Bidhannagar Property LawsFast-track Processing for NRIsOn-ground Support in Salt Lake & RajarhatReal-time Application Monitoring
Read More
🏗️ IntroductionIn a landmark decision that strengthens consumer rights, the Supreme Court of India has ruled that builders cannot deduct more than 10% of the total flat cost when a buyer cancels the booking. The judgment comes as a relief to countless homebuyers who have faced unfair deductions from real estate developers during cancellations. This ruling sets a powerful precedent and aligns with the principles of fairness and reasonableness under Indian contract and consumer protection law.Background: Why This Issue MattersOver the years, many homebuyers have reported instances where real estate developers deducted 20%, 25%, or even 30% of the total property value when a buyer decided to cancel the booking, often without starting construction or incurring any loss.This unfair trade practice prompted legal intervention, and the judiciary has now taken a stand to protect buyers from arbitrary contract clauses that are heavily biased in favour of builders.Supreme Court Ruling: Key HighlightsIn the case of Wg. Cdr. Arifur Rahman Khan & Ors. v. DLF Southern Homes Pvt. Ltd., the Supreme Court upheld the consumer-friendly interpretation that if the builder has not incurred a substantial loss or started construction, they cannot deduct more than 10% of the booking amount or flat price.Important Takeaways:Maximum Deduction Limit: Builders can deduct no more than 10% in case of cancellation.Beyond 10% is arbitrary and amounts to unjust enrichment.Unilateral terms in builder-buyer agreements that allow excessive deductions are unconscionable and voidable.The builder cannot use delay tactics or unjust contract terms to deny fair refunds.⚖️ Legal Reasoning: Supreme Court’s AnalysisThe Court based its ruling on several legal principles:Principle of Unconscionable ContractsWhen one party (the builder) has excessive bargaining power, the Court can strike down oppressive terms.Citing Central Inland Water Transport Corporation v. Brojo Nath, the Court emphasized that contractual terms must be reasonable and fair.Consumer Protection ActThe Court reaffirmed that a buyer is a consumer and entitled to just treatment under Sections 2(1)(d) & 2(1)(r) of the Consumer Protection Act.Builders indulging in excessive deduction are guilty of unfair trade practices.Doctrine of ReasonablenessBuilders are not permitted to make windfall gains from cancellations.Refund policy must reflect actual losses, not speculative penalties.Other Important Judgments on the SubjectKailash Nath Associates v. DDA [(2015) 4 SCC 136]The Court held that forfeiture of earnest money is only valid if the party has suffered a loss. Builders must prove actual damage for withholding more than 10%.Haryana Urban Development Authority v. Dropadi DeviOnly reasonable forfeiture is allowed. Excessive deduction without justification is illegal.RERA Provisions – Section 18 of RERA Act, 2016The buyer is entitled to full refund with interest if the builder fails to deliver on time. Deductions exceeding 10% are in direct conflict with RERA’s spirit.What It Means for HomebuyersIf you have cancelled your flat booking and the builder is withholding more than 10%, you have a strong legal remedy. The following steps are advised:📋 What You Can Do:Send a legal notice seeking full refund minus 10%.File a complaint with the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA).Approach Consumer Court if builder refuses or delays refund.Maintain booking receipts, payment records, and correspondence as evidence.Precautionary Measures for Future BuyersRead the Builder-Buyer Agreement thoroughly before signing.Negotiate clauses related to cancellation and refund.Prefer builders registered under RERA with transparent refund policies.Get legal vetting of the agreement from a property lawyer.How KHA Advocates Can HelpAt KHA Advocates, we assist homebuyers in fighting against builder malpractices, securing rightful refunds, and filing RERA and consumer complaints. Our team of real estate and litigation experts ensures your legal rights are protected.📞 Book a Consultation: https://khaadvocates.com/book-consultation🏢 Representing clients in Supreme Court, High Courts, RERA & Consumer ForumsConclusionThe Supreme Court’s ruling offers much-needed relief and clarity to homebuyers. By capping the builder’s deduction at 10%, the Court has reaffirmed the principle that contracts cannot override fairness and public interest. Homebuyers must remain informed, vigilant, and assertive in asserting their rights.
Read More
IntroductionMany landowners and property buyers in India mistakenly believe that mutation of property is equal to legal ownership. However, as clarified by the Supreme Court of India and several High Courts, mutation is merely a fiscal or administrative process and does not confer any title. This blog decodes the importance of mutation, its legal status, and critically examines landmark Supreme Court judgments that definitively settled the issue.What Is Mutation of Property?Mutation refers to the process of updating land or property records in the revenue department once ownership is transferred through sale, inheritance, gift, or will. It enables the government to assess and collect property tax from the rightful person.In simple terms, mutation reflects who is in possession for tax purposes, but it is not conclusive proof of ownership.Why Mutation Is ImportantWhile mutation is not ownership, it is still crucial for several reasons:It helps the government maintain updated land records.It ensures that the property tax is paid by the current possessor.It serves as a presumptive evidence of possession, aiding in administrative matters.It is often required when applying for electricity, water, or municipal services.It can be used in courts to support a claim, though not as standalone proof.Supreme Court’s Stand: Mutation Is Not Title🏛 Balwant Singh v. Daulat Singh (1997) 7 SCC 137In this case, the Supreme Court held:“Mutation in the revenue record does not create or extinguish title nor has it any presumptive value on title. It only enables the person in whose favour mutation is ordered to pay the land revenue.”This judgment laid the foundation for the doctrine that revenue records are fiscal and not legal proof of ownership.🏛 Narendra v. State of Uttar Pradesh (2017) 9 SCC 426Here, the Supreme Court clarified:“Entry in revenue records is not a document of title. It merely reflects possession. Title must be established independently through documents such as sale deed, gift deed, or court decree.”This means a person can be shown as a possessor in mutation records but still not be the rightful owner.🏛 Jitendra Singh v. State of Madhya Pradesh (2021) 2 SCC 612A more recent case where the Court reiterated:“The mutation of land in revenue records does not confer ownership title to the person. It only confirms possession for revenue purposes.”This case also emphasized that if a person’s title is challenged, they must prove it through registered documents and chain of title – not mere mutation.Mutation vs Title: Understanding the Legal DifferenceAspectMutationLegal Ownership (Title)NatureAdministrative / fiscalLegal / proprietaryPurposeTax assessment, record updationConfers full rights and interest in propertyDocument RequiredApplication to revenue authoritiesRegistered sale deed / gift / will / court decreeProof of Ownership?❌ No✅ YesCan be challenged?✅ Easily❌ Not easily if legally registeredUse in litigation?Limited supportPrimary evidenceHigh Court Rulings on Mutation Not Being Ownership🏛 Madras High Court – K. Muthulakshmi v. The Tahsildar (2015)Held that:“Mutation entries in revenue records are neither conclusive nor final. Ownership has to be proved through valid title documents.”🏛 Delhi High Court – Ashok Kumar v. Delhi Jal Board (2012)The Court ruled that:“A mutated name in municipal records cannot be relied on to establish legal title. Mutation cannot replace a registered title deed.”Common Misconceptions About Mutation“If my name is in mutation, I am the owner.”❌ Wrong. You are merely the recognized possessor for tax purposes.“Mutation replaces the need for registration.”❌ False. Only a registered deed establishes title.“Mutation protects me from legal disputes.”❌ Not entirely. Without a valid title, your claim can be challenged.When Mutation Becomes Relevant in CourtAlthough mutation is not ownership, it can support a claim of possession when:There is no contesting title, andIt is combined with other evidence like tax receipts, utility bills, or long possession.Still, courts always look for legal instruments to decide ownership.Conclusion: Mutation Is Not Ownership – Know the Legal TruthIn conclusion, mutation is important for taxation and record maintenance, but it does not grant or prove ownership. Indian courts – including the Supreme Court – have consistently held that title must be proven through registered legal documents, not revenue entries.If you’re purchasing or inheriting property, always ensure you have:A registered title deedA clear chain of titleEncumbrance certificate & title searchAnd legal assistance for documentation📞 Need Expert Legal Help?At KHA Advocates, we specialize in property law, title verification, mutation correction, and real estate litigation. Our experienced team can ensure your property rights are secure and legally valid.📩 Contact Us Today or visit www.KhaAdvocates.com for a consultation.
Read More
Does mutation of property mean you’re the legal owner? Think again.In the world of Indian real estate, “mutation” is a commonly misunderstood term. Many believe that once a property is mutated in their name, they automatically become the legal owner. However, the Supreme Court of India has clarified this misconception through several landmark judgments. Let’s unpack what mutation really means—and more importantly, what it doesn’t.What is Mutation of Property?Mutation refers to the process of updating or recording the transfer of title of a property in the revenue records of the local municipal authority. This allows the government to charge property tax from the rightful person.Mutation may be required:After the purchase of propertyUpon inheritanceVia gift deed or willThrough a court decreeHowever, mutation is not a document of title. It is merely a fiscal record maintained for administrative purposes.⚖️ Supreme Court’s View on Mutation & Ownership🏛️ Key Judgement: Balwant Singh vs Daulat Singh (1997) 7 SCC 137The Supreme Court held that mutation entries do not confer any title nor do they have any presumptive value on ownership. They are primarily for revenue collection and cannot be used as conclusive proof of ownership in a court of law.“Mutation does not create or extinguish title. It does not have any presumptive value on ownership.”– Supreme Court, Balwant Singh vs Daulat Singh🏛️ Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay vs. Lala Pancham (1965 AIR 1008)This judgment reinforced that mutation is not a mode of transfer of ownership. The Court stated that unless there’s a valid legal transfer through sale, gift, or inheritance, mutation cannot determine ownership rights.⚖️ High Court Judgments Supporting the Principle🏛️ Karnataka High Court – Nanjundegowda vs. State of Karnataka (2011)The Court held that revenue entries (mutation) are not documents of title, and ownership can only be proved by valid documents such as registered sale deeds, gift deeds, or court decrees.🏛️ Delhi High Court – Jagjit Singh vs. Union of India (2013)The Court clarified that even if someone’s name is entered in municipal records via mutation, it cannot override the rights of a person holding a legally registered title deed.❌ Common Myths About MutationMythRealityMutation = Ownership❌ No, it’s not proof of ownershipMutation means title transfer❌ Only legal instruments like sale/gift deed do thatMutation protects you in court❌ Courts rely on title documents, not revenue entries🧾 Legal Documents That Actually Prove OwnershipRegistered Sale DeedGift Deed (with mutation as a follow-up)Probated WillPartition DeedCourt Decree of Title📝 Why Mutation Still MattersWhile mutation doesn’t prove ownership, it is still crucial for property tax liability, obtaining building permissions, and utility connections. It ensures that the municipal records are up to date and that the right person is billed.Key TakeawaysMutation is not proof of ownership.It is a record for taxation and revenue purposes only.Ownership must be proved through registered legal documents.Supreme Court and High Courts have consistently ruled on this matter.Always consult a property lawyer before assuming mutation equals title.📞 Need Legal Help With Property Title or Mutation?At KHA ADVOCATES, we specialize in property law, title verification, mutation assistance, and litigation support across India. Our team handles disputes related to ownership, mutation denial, and false claims, backed by a strong record in High Courts and the Supreme Court.👉 Contact Us Now for a consultation!
Read More
The legal distinction between a Gift/Settlement Deed and a Will plays a vital role in property transfer and succession planning under Indian law. The Supreme Court of India, in a series of landmark judgments, has clarified the core legal principles that separate these two instruments. Understanding the difference is crucial to avoid future disputes, especially concerning immovable property.Definitions Under Indian LawGift Deed / Settlement DeedA Gift Deed, governed by Section 122 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, is a voluntary transfer of property by one person (donor) to another (donee) without consideration, accepted by the donee during the lifetime of the donor. A Settlement Deed is a broader document often used to distribute property among family members for future stability.Key Features:Immediate and irrevocable transferRequires registration under Section 17 of the Registration Act, 1908Stamp duty applicable as per state lawEffective during the lifetime of the settlor/donorWillA Will, as per Section 2(h) of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, is a legal declaration of the testator’s intention with respect to their property, which comes into effect only after their death.Key Features:Revocable until the testator’s deathNo stamp duty requiredRegistration is optional but advisableTakes effect posthumouslySupreme Court’s Interpretation: Key Judgments🔹 Thulasamma v. Sesha Reddy (1977)The Court held that the intention of the parties is paramount. Even if a document is titled a “Settlement,” if it confers rights only after the death of the settlor, it operates as a Will.🔹 Radha Ammal v. Camillus AIR 2006 SC 1781The Supreme Court clarified that nomenclature is not conclusive. A document labeled as a settlement deed may actually be a Will if the transfer is postponed until the death of the person executing the deed.🔹 K.K. Mohammad Ali v. State of Kerala (2010) 1 SCC 417It was emphasized that the timing of when the rights vest in the beneficiary is critical. If vesting is immediate, it’s a gift/settlement. If it’s deferred till death, it’s a will.Key Legal Differences SummarizedAspectGift/Settlement DeedWillTakes EffectImmediatelyAfter DeathRevocabilityIrrevocableRevocableStamp DutyMandatoryNot RequiredRegistrationMandatoryOptionalConsiderationNot RequiredNot ApplicableVesting of RightsDuring Settlor’s LifetimeUpon Testator’s DeathWhy This Distinction MattersSuccession Disputes: Incorrect drafting may lead to family feuds and litigation.Tax Implications: Stamp duty and tax liability differ drastically.Validity Issues: Unregistered gift deeds may be invalid; unregistered wills may face challenge during probate.Pro Tips by KHA ADVOCATESUse Precise Language: Clearly express intention to avoid misinterpretation.Consult a Property Lawyer: Especially important for NRI clients dealing with Indian assets.Register All Deeds: Avoid ambiguity by registering gifts/settlements.Update Will Regularly: Changes in family or assets must be reflected promptly.ConclusionThe Supreme Court’s consistent stance makes one thing clear: intention and timing of vesting are the defining parameters. While both documents can be used to transfer property, choosing the correct one based on your situation is vital. Legal consultation ensures your assets are protected and your legacy preserved.
Read More
IntroductionIn property transactions, regulatory compliance is critical—especially in urban areas governed by municipal bodies. This article explores the role of Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation (BMC) in property mutation, with particular focus on the significance of Completion Certificates (CC) and the acceptance of affidavits when such certificates are unavailable. We analyze the legal implications and practical necessity of these affidavits in mutation proceedings.1. Overview of Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation (BMC)Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation (BMC) is the governing authority for the Bidhannagar region in Kolkata, West Bengal. Established under the West Bengal Municipal Act, BMC is responsible for delivering essential civic amenities including sanitation, infrastructure maintenance, water supply, and waste management.The Corporation also plays a pivotal role in urban planning and development—particularly in issuing building permits, monitoring construction, enforcing building regulations, and overseeing property registration and mutation processes.2. What is a Completion Certificate (CC)?A Completion Certificate is a formal document issued by a municipal authority like BMC after verifying that a building has been constructed according to the sanctioned plan, applicable building codes, environmental laws, and safety standards.Key purposes of a CC:Confirms the legality and habitability of a property.Mandatory for availing utility connections (e.g., water, electricity).Prerequisite for mutation, i.e., transferring ownership in municipal records.3. Role of BMC in Property TransactionsBMC ensures regulatory compliance at every stage of property development and transfer. Its key functions include:A. Issuing Building PermitsBefore construction begins, BMC reviews and approves building plans, ensuring alignment with zoning rules and municipal codes.B. Construction MonitoringBMC conducts periodic inspections to verify that ongoing work adheres to approved designs and regulatory norms.C. Granting Completion CertificatesAfter inspection, a CC is issued to certify that the construction complies with all prescribed standards.D. Managing Property MutationBMC updates municipal records following property transfers, a process known as mutation. A valid CC is typically required for this update.4. When There is No Completion Certificate: Role of Affidavit in MutationIn cases where the building lacks a valid CC—often due to developer negligence or regulatory delays—BMC may still allow mutation through a legally binding affidavit submitted by the property owner.A. Purpose and Legal Weight of the AffidavitThe affidavit serves as:A declaration of facts acknowledging the absence of a CC.An acknowledgment of risks, including legal liabilities associated with occupying or selling a property without a CC.A commitment to cooperate with the municipal body in future compliance.A safeguard for BMC, indemnifying it against legal consequences of mutating a non-compliant property.By accepting the affidavit, BMC allows for practical continuity in property transactions while documenting the owner’s full awareness of legal responsibilities.ConclusionThe Completion Certificate is an essential legal safeguard in real estate, ensuring that buildings are constructed per approved plans. However, practical realities sometimes necessitate mutation without a CC. In such cases, BMC permits mutation based on a sworn affidavit, balancing legal compliance with procedural pragmatism.Understanding this mechanism is crucial for property owners, buyers, developers, and legal professionals operating in Bidhannagar. It ensures transparency, protects stakeholders, and facilitates smooth transactions even when regulatory hurdles exist.Standard Format: Affidavit for Mutation Without Completion Certificate AFFIDAVITI, [Name], aged about [Age] years, son/daughter of [Father’s Name], by faith [Religion], by occupation [Occupation], residing at [Address], do hereby solemnly affirm and state as follows:That I am the rightful owner of a flat located at [Flat Details], which I purchased from [Developer’s Name] through a registered Deed of Conveyance at [Registry Office Details].That the said building has not been issued a Completion Certificate by the competent authority.That I have been informed by the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation that an affidavit is required to process the mutation of the said flat.That I acknowledge the legal implications of owning a property in a building without a Completion Certificate, including the associated risks of occupation or transfer.That the absence of the CC is not due to any fault of mine, and I relied on the developer to obtain all statutory approvals.That I am willing to cooperate fully with BMC and take all necessary steps to regularize the situation and obtain the Completion Certificate.That the contents of this affidavit are true to the best of my knowledge and belief. I understand that providing false information may invite legal consequences.Solemnly affirmed and declared at [Court Name] on this ___ day of _________, 202.Signature of the DeponentIdentified by meAdvocate
Read More
IntroductionSalt Lake City, officially known as Bidhannagar, was conceptualized and developed under the leadership of Dr. Bidhan Chandra Roy, the then Chief Minister of West Bengal. Conceived as a modern satellite township adjacent to Kolkata, the project involved the acquisition of wetlands and privately owned lands. These lands were subsequently allotted to individuals through lease agreements, each extending up to an unprecedented 999 years—ensuring government control while granting long-term occupancy rights.Initially, allotments were conducted through a lottery system. However, with time, the issue of property transfers within Salt Lake arose. The restrictive nature of lease deeds and the absence of a clear legal mechanism for transferring leasehold rights led many lessees to opt for unofficial means such as executing Powers of Attorney or Wills—resulting in a loss of revenue for the State.To address this issue and to establish legal clarity, the West Bengal government introduced a formal framework through a Gazette Notification in 2012. This article aims to provide a comprehensive and simplified explanation of the current legal position, procedures, and key judgments related to leasehold property transfers in Bidhannagar.Types of Lease Deeds in Salt LakeThe 17-Clause Lease DeedAmong the earliest lease agreements executed in the 1970s, the 17-Clause Lease Deed granted leaseholders more liberal terms, with no explicit restrictions on the transfer of property. Roughly 88 such deeds were issued to the first group of Salt Lake allottees.Due to the absence of any clause requiring government approval for transfer, leaseholders under this deed have historically enjoyed greater flexibility. Over the years, the Calcutta High Court has supported this interpretation, directing authorities to process mutations in favour of transferees without insisting on government permission.The 20-Clause Lease DeedUnlike the 17-Clause version, the 20-Clause Lease Deed contains specific restrictions that require prior approval from the Urban Development Department before any transfer of the leasehold property. These restrictive covenants are aimed at maintaining state oversight and regulating the sale of government-leased land.2012 Gazette Notification: Regulation of TransfersOn June 22, 2012, the West Bengal Government issued a Gazette Notification (No. 2709-SL(AL)/4S-9/2004(Pt-I)) introducing a formal transfer policy for leasehold plots in Bidhannagar. Key highlights include:Mandatory Government Approval: Transfer of leasehold rights requires prior permission from the Urban Development Department.Transfer Fee: A fee of ₹5,00,000 per cottah was introduced. However, exemptions apply for intra-family transfers (e.g., to parents or spouse).Regularization of Past Transfers: Past transactions conducted without government approval could be regularized upon payment of the transfer fee and completion of required formalities.Binding Lease Terms: All transfers are subject to the original lease terms, and the transferee inherits the obligations of the lease.This notification primarily targeted restrictive leasehold deeds (such as the 20-Clause Deed) but caused confusion regarding its applicability to 17-Clause Deeds.Landmark Judgment: State of West Bengal & Ors. vs. Ajay Poddar & Anr.This pivotal case resolved key ambiguities surrounding the 17-Clause Lease Deed. The issue before the Supreme Court was whether lessees holding 17-Clause Deeds could transfer their property without government approval or paying the transfer fee mandated in the 2012 notification.Supreme Court Ruling (March 11, 2015):The Apex Court ruled that the 17-Clause Deeds did not require government approval for transfers.The ₹5,00,000 per cottah transfer fee was deemed applicable only to restrictive lease deeds, such as those containing the 20 clauses.Past transfers executed without prior permission under 17-Clause Deeds were held valid, provided they complied with other legal requirements.Government agencies were directed to process mutations for such transfers without demanding approval or fees.This judgment provided significant relief to lessees and removed procedural bottlenecks for a large number of plot owners.2016 Circular: Simplification with ConditionsFollowing the Supreme Court judgment, the Urban Development Department issued Circular No. 693-UD/LM/SL(AL)-4S-5/2016 on May 4, 2016. This clarified the operational procedures for transferring 17-Clause Leasehold Plots:Prior Approval Not Required: Lessees need not seek permission from the government before transferring their plots.Mandatory Transfer Fee: Despite the removal of permission requirements, the transfer fee continues to apply—even for 17-Clause Deeds.Regularization of Past Transactions: Unauthorized transfers can be legalized upon payment of fees and proper documentation.This circular sought to balance ease of transactions with the state’s revenue interests and legal accountability.Step-by-Step Procedure to Buy Leasehold Plots in Salt Lake1. Document CollectionLease DeedAllotment LetterMutation Certificate (if applicable)Tax Clearance CertificateNo Objection Certificates (as applicable)2. Title Verification & Agreement PreparationConduct a thorough title search.Draft an “Agreement for Assignment of Lease” detailing sale price, terms, and responsibilities.3. Application for Transfer PermissionPrepare an application along with:Identity proof of buyer and sellerCertified copies of lease documentsAgreement for assignmentTax receipts and No Dues Certificate4. Online SubmissionRegister on the official portal of the Urban Development Authority.Upload notarized documents in PDF format (max 2MB each).Pay the application fee (currently ₹1,000).5. Verification ProcessAuthorities review documents and conduct physical inspection of the plot to match records.6. Hearing & Payment of Transfer FeeAttend the scheduled hearing with buyer, seller, and legal representatives.Pay the applicable transfer fee based on plot area.Submit draft deed for government approval.7. Deed RegistrationExecute and register the final Lease Transfer Deed at the designated registration office.The government issues a registration order upon approval.8. MutationSubmit the registered deed to the Urban Development Authority within 60 days.Apply for mutation to update ownership in official land records.Obtain a Mutation Certificate upon approval.ConclusionSalt Lake’s land transfer laws have evolved significantly since the township’s inception. The early liberal 17-Clause Lease Deeds offered flexibility, later reaffirmed by the Supreme Court, while the more regulated 20-Clause Deeds require strict compliance with transfer procedures.The 2012 notification and subsequent 2016 circular laid the groundwork for a structured and revenue-conscious framework. While these measures aimed to streamline transfers and reduce irregularities, practical challenges such as administrative delays and lack of public awareness continue to persist.Understanding the legal nuances and following proper procedures is crucial for any individual seeking to buy or transfer leasehold property in Bidhannagar. For smooth execution and legal compliance, it is strongly advised to consult experienced property lawyers familiar with Salt Lake’s unique lease framework.Need Legal Assistance for Salt Lake Property Transfers?At KHA ADVOCATES, our dedicated legal team provides expert assistance for lease deed reviews, mutation, registration, and title verification in Bidhannagar. Contact us today for a hassle-free consultation.📞 Call Now 94-777-5-888-5 | 🌐 Visit www.khaadvocates.comRelevant Links:Circular https://www.wburbanservices.gov.in/upload_file/circular/1721-ud.pdf2012 notification https://www.wburbanservices.gov.in/upload_file/file_doc/al_2709_3377.pdf88 Plots https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/kolkata/salt-lake-plot-transfer-begins-again/articleshow/53470533.cms
Read More
KhA Advocates is a premier law firm in Kolkata, West Bengal known Internationally, providing expert legal services in property registration, corporate law, matrimonial law, taxation, dispute resolution, and more. We offer tailored legal solutions for NRIs, businesses, and residents, ensuring 100% compliance and protection. With our efficient, transparent, and reliable approach, we safeguard your legal interests.
